And there will be the usual OEM Only Turing Variants also. Nvidia has more Base Die Tapeouts with the Turing Generation than it had for its Pascal Generation of GPUs so look for even more sub-segements for Turing that are divided the RTX and GTX(Sans tensor and RT cores) major Turing segements. Nvidia’s product stack is rather segemented based on performance what with Nvidia using even lower clocked GDDR5 along with less GTX/Turing SMs on the 1660. So while the games/gaming engine ecosystem will take its time adopting RTX, if First generation RTX can even be usable for the lowest end Nvidia GPU SKUs for gaming anyways! So Nvidia can still compete better at a lower price with AMD’s SKUs in Raster Only Oriented gaming titles. The Turing GPU micro arch’s SMs with their concurrent Int/FP execution, other Turing SM tweaks, is a better performer than Pascal’s non-concurrent Int/FP execution. Nvidia will probably be filling out some even lower binned variant of that TU116 Base Die Tapeout for even more die harvesting and replacing more Pascal SKUs with Turing/GTX offerings, sans the RTX, on the low end of the GPU pricing totem pole. No it’s just an example of Nvidia’s binning operations, and AMD does the same thing, albeit with lower numbers of Base Die Tapeouts compared to Nvidia. The card is based on the same TU116 GPU as the GTX 1660 Ti, and while the Ti features the full version of TU116, this non-Ti version has two of the SMs disabled, bringing the count from 24 to 22.” “So what is a GTX 1660 minus the “Ti”? A hybrid product of sorts, it turns out.
0 kommentar(er)
